Numerous applicants seek roles in protective services — whether as a executive security agent, airport screener, corporate security officer, or investigative agent. These roles demand endurance and strength, mental clarity, and an consistent trustworthiness. However, not every applicant qualifies because specific medical impairments may interfere with job performance, pose safety risks, or prevent meeting stringent medical standards.

A top reason for rejection is chronic elevated blood pressure. Security staff routinely endure long, grueling shifts, react to urgent incidents, and may be required to make split-second decisions in high-stress environments. Untreated cardiovascular strain can trigger life-threatening cardiac events during these intense moments. Government and private agencies typically insist that applicants submit consistent medical records over time, supported by clinical documentation.

A history of heart-related disorders like coronary event, heart failure, or irregular heart rhythms are significant medical concerns. Though the individual may be stable, the unpredictable nature of cardiac events makes these conditions a non-negotiable disqualifier. Employers expect continuous physical readiness, 警備業 and no employer can afford having an employee suffer a medical emergency during critical operations.

Chronic breathing disorders like unmanaged asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease can also lead to rejection. Duties may include wearing heavy protective equipment, scaling barriers or elevated positions, chasing fleeing suspects, or working in poorly ventilated spaces. Reduced respiratory capacity can create a safety hazard for the entire team.

Mental health conditions are another key area of review. People living with panic disorders, persistent low mood, or manic-depressive illness lead productive, successful lives, ongoing symptoms without intervention may be grounds for rejection if they affect judgment, composure under pressure, or the ability to respond appropriately in high-stress situations. Medical reviewers look for evidence of sustained stability, confirmed follow-up care, and absence of inpatient care.

Epilepsy and other seizure disorders are commonly rejected, especially for roles that involve driving patrol units, climbing towers, or using tactical equipment. An unanticipated episode could endanger the officer and bystanders. Some agencies may consider applicants who have been seizure-free for several years and are under consistent medical supervision, but approval is highly exceptional and varies by position sensitivity.

Sensory limitations that remain below required levels are routine grounds for rejection. Officers need to reliably spot subtle signs of suspicious behavior, interpret visual alerts, detect low-volume sounds, or maintain secure comms. Reduced sensory acuity can undermine situational awareness.

Unregulated blood glucose levels can be a medically flagged issue due to the danger of insulin shock. Rapid glucose fluctuations may cause impaired judgment and physical incapacitation. Those with this condition typically must prove, and have no history of severe reactions on duty.

alcohol dependency or current dependence on alcohol or drugs is routinely grounds for rejection. Employers require absolute reliability and unimpaired judgment. Employers conduct thorough background investigations and compliance-based testing for this reason. Previous misuse that included illegal activity or workplace incidents may permanently block hiring.

It’s important to recognize that not all conditions automatically disqualify. Many employers take personal medical context, treatment history, and verified physician reports. Applicants with well-managed or stable conditions may pass medical review, especially if they can demonstrate consistent job readiness. Essential elements for approval are honesty, consistent professional treatment, and cooperative engagement with medical reviewers.